Just as some problems are too big for one person to solve, some tasks are too complex for a single artificial intelligence (AI) agent to handle. Instead, the best approach is to decompose problems into smaller, specialized units so that multiple agents can work together as a team.
This is the foundation of a multi-agent system—networks of agents, each with a specific role, collaborating to solve larger problems.
When building a multi-agent system, you need a way to coordinate how agents interact. If every agent talks directly to every other agent, things quickly become a tangled mess, making it hard to scale and debug. That’s where the orchestrator pattern comes in.
Instead of agents making ad hoc decisions about where to send messages, a central orchestrator acts as the parent node, deciding which agent should handle a given task based on context. The orchestrator takes in messages, interprets them, and routes them to the right agent at the right time. This makes the system dynamic, adaptable, and scalable.
Think of it as a well-run dispatch center.
Instead of individual responders deciding where to go, a central system evaluates incoming information and directs it efficiently. This ensures that agents don’t duplicate work or operate in isolation but do collaborate effectively without hard-coded dependencies.
In this article, we’ll walk through how to build an event-driven orchestrator for multi-agent systems using Apache Flink® and Apache Kafka®, leveraging Flink to interpret and route messages while using Kafka as the system’s short-term shared memory.
At the core of any multi-agent system is how agents communicate.
Request/response models, while simple to conceptualize, tend to break down when systems need to evolve, adapt to new information, or operate in unpredictable environments. That’s why event-driven messaging, powered by technologies such as Kafka and Flink, is typically the better model for enterprise applications.
An event-driven architecture allows agents to communicate dynamically without rigid dependencies, making them more autonomous and resilient. Instead of hard-coding relationships, agents react to events, enabling greater flexibility, parallelism, and fault tolerance.
In the same way that event-driven architectures provide decoupling for microservices and teams, they provide advantages when building a multi-agent system. An agent is essentially a stateful microservice with a brain, so many of the same patterns for building reliable distributed systems apply to agents as well.
Additionally, stream governance can verify message structure, preventing malformed data from disrupting the system. This is often missing in existing multi-agent frameworks, making event-driven architectures even more compelling.
In complex systems, agents rarely work in isolation.
Real-world applications require multiple agents to collaborate by handling distinct responsibilities while sharing context. This introduces challenges for task dependencies, failure recovery, and communication efficiency.
The orchestrator pattern solves this by introducing a lead agent, or orchestrator, that directs other agents in problem-solving. Instead of static workflows like traditional microservices, agents generate dynamic execution plans, breaking down tasks and adapting in real time.
This flexibility, however, creates challenges:
Task Explosion—Agents can generate unbounded tasks, requiring resource management.
Monitoring and Recovery—Agents need a way to track progress, catch failures, and replan.
Scalability—The system must handle an increasing number of agent interactions without bottlenecks.
This is where event-driven architectures shine.
With a streaming backbone, agents can react to new data immediately, track dependencies efficiently, and recover from failures gracefully, all without centralized bottlenecks.
Agentic systems are fundamentally dynamic, stateful, and adaptive—meaning event-driven architectures are a natural fit.
In the rest of this article, we’ll break down a reference architecture for event-driven multi-agent systems and show how to implement an orchestrator pattern using Flink and Kafka, powering real-time agent decision-making at scale.
Building scalable multi-agent systems requires real-time decision-making and dynamic routing of messages between agents. This is where Flink plays a crucial role.
Flink is a stream processing engine designed to handle stateful computations on unbounded streams of data. Unlike batch processing frameworks, Flink can process events in real time, making it an ideal tool for orchestrating multi-agent interactions.
As discussed earlier, multi-agent systems need an orchestrator to decide which agent should handle a given task. Instead of agents making ad hoc decisions, the orchestrator ingests messages, interprets them using a large language model (LLM), and routes them to the right agent.
To support this orchestration pattern with Flink, Kafka is the messaging backbone, and Flink is the processing engine:
Message Production:
Agents produce messages to a Kafka topic.
Each message contains the raw contextual data relevant to an agent.
Flink Processing and Routing:
A Flink job listens to new messages in Kafka.
The message is passed to an LLM, which determines the most appropriate agent to handle it.
The LLM's decision is based on a structured agent definition, which includes:
Agent Name—Unique identifier for the agent
Description—Agent’s primary function
Input—Expected data format the agent processes enforced by a data contract
Output